If you've ever wandered through a city you might have noticed tiny mini 5G cell towers placed on poles for street lighting. They look like little boxes, but they're actually broadcasting wireless signals from mobile providers to your phone. They are replacing the larger specially-designed cell towers. While they're less noticeable but they can still create issues for users. A of the FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds define the maximum amount of time a person can be exposed to electromagnetic radiation from wireless devices. The limits of exposure are based on scientific data which prove that electromagnetic energy can be harmful to human health. The rate of absorption called the specific absorption rate (SAR) is an indicator of the amount of radiofrequency energy that is absorbed by tissue. It's usually 1.6 Watts per kilogram calculated over one gram of tissue. Since 5g is able to transmit at higher frequencies, it has the potential to increase the intensity of energy on the skin and other exposed body areas. This can result in various potential harms, including exacerbated development of skin diseases like dermatitis, skin cancer and cataracts. Due to the possible harmful effects of radiation from 5G, PSU has chosen to create a general limits on power density, which is 4mW/cm2 averaged across 1 centimeter, but not exceeding 30 minutes for the entire 5G spectrum at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is in accordance with the maximum spatial-average SAR of 1.6 W/kg, averaged over one 5 grams of body tissue, at 6 GHz. The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds If you've ever used a mobile phone, then you've probably realized that the safest location from the tower is at least 400 meters. This is because the power of the transmission of a cell tower increases dramatically the further your location from the tower. Although this may sound like an ideal idea but the truth is that people who live close to towers may actually be more prone to health issues. For instance, a study conducted in 2014 in India found that those living within 50 meters of cell towers had significantly more health complaints than those living further far from antennas. But, the study revealed that those who relocated to areas that were further from cell towers noticed their symptoms return to normal within a couple of days. Studies have also demonstrated that exposure to extreme amounts of electromagnetic field radiofrequency (EMFs) can cause brain tumors, cancer as well as other health issues. This is due to the fact that RF radiation, which is used in wireless communication, can penetrate the human body's outer layer, called the skin. This is vital to be aware of because the skin acts as a protective barrier against injury to the body, infection by pathogenic microorganisms, and the entry of harmful substances. what is a safe distance from a cell tower is the largest organ of the human body, and is responsible for protecting other organs. https://bedroot5.bloggersdelight.dk/2023/04/27/are-usually-safest-distance-from-the-5g-cell-system/ for the Minimum Exposure The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds are based on various assumptions that aren't supported by scientific evidence. They include the incorrect belief that short-term exposures RF radiation are safe because of the minimal absorption into body (i.e. the heating of tissues). This also overlooks the deeper penetration of the ELF components of modulated RF signals, as well as the consequences of short bursts of heat from pulsed RF waves. These theories are not compatible with the current understanding of biological effects of RF radiation. As such, they should not be used for health protective exposure guidelines. In what is a safe distance from a cell tower there is the fact that both ICNIRP and FCC restrict the maximum limits of exposure to peak local SARs, based on the maximum frequency of absorption (psSAR), which can be described as not a sufficient dosimetric tool to assess the amount of exposure to radiofrequency radiation. Particularly the psSAR tool is not accurate for frequencies above 6 GHz. Additionally, psSAR hasn't been tested for RF radiation with co-exposure to other environmental agents , such like sunlight. The interactions of RF radiation with other agents in the environment could result in antagonistic or synergistic results. This could result in the risk of having adverse health consequences. For example, co-exposure to RF radiation with sunlight may cause an increase in the incidence of developing skin cancer and exacerbate other skin conditions like acne.
what is a safe distance from a cell tower|https://bedroot5.bloggersdelight.dk/2023/04/27/are-usually-safest-distance-from-the-5g-cell-system/|what is a safe distance from a cell tower
